Michael Pezzullo chose to ignore a piece of his own advice

Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo does not deserve to remain in his role a minute longer,stood aside or otherwise. He does not deserve the confidence of the current federal government,nor any that might follow.

Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo.

Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo.Alex Ellinghausen

The powerful department head should have stood down from his long-time role immediately when it became apparent that his covert political conduct would be exposed,rather than waiting to be told to do so by his supervising minister.

As George Brandis,the attorney-general who drew his ire during the establishment of the Home Affairs department Pezzullo now runs,wrote in theHerald on Monday:“Whatever happens to Pezzullo now – his position is plainly untenable,since no minister,Labor or Liberal,will ever be able to trust him again.

TheHerald commends Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil for suspending Pezzullo less than a day afterThe Sydney Morning Herald,The Ageand60 Minutes revealed that he spent years using a political backchannel to two Liberal prime ministers to undermine political and public service enemies,promote the careers of conservative politicians he considered allies,and lobby to muzzle the press. The prime minister’s promise to “expedite” an inquiry into the revelations from this masthead is also welcome.

O’Neil has referred Pezzullo to the newly appointed Australian Public Service Commissioner,Gordon De Brouwer,for investigation,and says she will not comment further until the investigation is completed.Former Australian Public Service commissioner Lynelle Briggs has been appointed to oversee the investigation.

Pezzullo’s repeated counselling of Liberal powerbroker Scott Briggs to convey to Coalition prime ministers and others his personal suggestions about who should be in ministerial portfolios amounts to improper conduct that directly breaches the Public Service Act,which requires all public servants to act apolitically.

In many ways,this conduct is the predictable culmination of three decades of inexorable politicisation of the bureaucracy at federal and state levels.

Pezzullo has served both Labor and Coalition governments in that time,but under the Coalition he accrued a bureaucratic stronghold perhaps unrivalled since wartime. Outside Prime Minister and Cabinet,Home Affairs represents the most formidable agglomeration of the nation’s powerful security,immigration and border enforcement agencies.

His role fundamentally vested him with extraordinary influence,and he was trusted implicitly by successive governments to wield that influence judiciously and impartially.

The Public Service Act requires federal public servants to behave at all times apolitically and with integrity. These values and the statute were referenced by Pezzullo in speeches in 2018 and November 2022.

In 2018,he declared:“An apolitical public service is one of the key institutions in our Westminster system … What is important for the public servant is to absent oneself from any partisan discussions and avoid exposure to raw politics.”

He said the public service mission is not to shape governments to suit public servants’ personal preferences or outlook;if this didn’t suit,then “we should resign our positions as public servants and run for office ourselves”. Sound advice.

And in November,he said he would need to “tread very carefully so as to avoid the appearance of expressing any view whatsoever on the conduct of politics”.

But despite former Home Affairs minister and current Opposition Leader Peter Dutton saying he had always “conducted himself in a thoroughly professional way in my dealings with him,” Pezzullo’s own messages appear to show he was not following his own counsel.

The current government must deal with both this specific scandal and the broader questions it raises about the state of the public service.

Australians are entitled to an explanation as to how this behaviour was able to take place from someone in such a prominent and influential position,seemingly unchecked,over a long period of time.

They also deserve an assurance that action will be taken to prevent such behaviour in the future. The government should explain its plans to stop the public service from being further politicised. Meaningful answers won’t come immediately,but they should come soon.

Australians have the right to demand much higher standards of the people who run our institutions than have been on display in the Pezzullo scandal.

As for Pezzullo,he should take his own advice.

Bevan Shields sends an exclusive newsletter to subscribers each week.Sign up to receive his Note from the Editor.

Since the Herald was first published in 1831,the editorial team has believed it important to express a considered view on the issues of the day for readers,always putting the public interest first.

Most Viewed in Politics