Reserve Bank of Australia’s rate hikes raise risk of recession

Economics Editor

Our sudden,shocking encounter with high inflation has brought to light a disturbing truth:we now have a dysfunctional economy,in which big business has gained too much power over the prices it can charge,while the nation’s households have lost what power they had to protect their incomes from inflation.

It has also revealed the limitations and crudity of the main instrument we’ve used to manage the macro economy for the past 40 years:monetary policy – the manipulation of interest rates by the central bank.

Reserve Bank of Australia governor Philip Lowe.

Reserve Bank of Australia governor Philip Lowe.Alex Ellinghausen

We’ve been reminded that monetary policy can’t fix problems on the supply (production) side of the economy. Nor can it fix problems arising from the underlying structure of how the economy works.

All it can do is use interest rates to speed up or slow down the demand (spending) side of the economy. And even there,it has little direct effect on the spending of governments or on the investment spending of businesses.

Its control over interest rates gives it direct influence only on the spending of households. And,for the most part,that means spending that has to be done on borrowed money:buying a home. But also,renting a home some landlord has borrowed to buy.

Get it? The Reserve Bank of Australia’s governor’s power to manipulate interest rates largely boils down to influencing how much households spend on their biggest single item of spending:housing. Because no one wants to be homeless,using interest rates to increase the cost of housing leaves people with less to spend on everything else.

The Reserve Bank’s plan to get inflation down quickly involves allowing a transfer of many billions from the pockets of households to the profits of big business.

This means the governor has little direct influence over big business’s ability to take advantage of strong demand to widen its profit margins. He must get at businesses indirectly,via his power to reduce their customers’ ability to keep buying their products.

Get it? Households are the meat in the sandwich between the RBA and big business (with small business using the cover of big business’s big price hikes to sneak up their own profit margins).

Join the dots,and you realise the RBA’s plan to get inflation down quickly involves allowing a transfer of many billions from the pockets of households to the profits of big business.

On one hand,big business has been allowed to raise its prices by more than needed to cover the jump in its costs arising from the supply disruptions of the pandemic and the Ukraine war. On the other,the loss of union bargaining power means big business has had little trouble ensuring its wage bill rises at a much lower rate than retail prices have.

So,it’s households that are picking up the tab for the RBA’s solution to the inflation problem. They’ll pay for it with higher mortgage interest rates and rents,and a fall in the value of their homes,but mainly by having their wages rise by a lot less than the rise in their cost of living.

More than half of businesses say they are passing on increased costs to consumers.

More than half of businesses say they are passing on increased costs to consumers.Sean Davey

The RBA’s unspoken game plan is to squeeze households until demand for goods and services has weakened to the point where big business decides that raising its prices to increase its profits would cost it so many sales that it would be left worse off.

It may even come to pass that households have been squeezed so badly big businesses’ sales start falling,and some of them decide that cutting their price to win back sales would leave them better off.

In economists’ notation,maximising profits – or minimising losses – is all about finding the best combination of “p” (price) and “q” (quantity demanded).

You don’t believe big businesses ever cut their prices? It’s common for them to “discount” their prices in ways that disguise their retreat,using special offers,holding sales,and otherwise allowing a gap between their advertised price and the price many customers actually pay.

But why would that nice mother’s boy Dr Philip Lowe,whose statutory duty is to ensure that monetary policy is directed to “the greatest advantage of the people of Australia”,impose so much pain on so many ordinary people,who played no part in causing the problem he’s grappling with?

Because,as all central bankers do,he sees keeping inflation low as his central responsibility. And he doesn’t see any other way to stop prices rising so rapidly. It’s a case study in just what a crude,inadequate and blunt instrument monetary policy is.

Lowe justifies his measures to reduce inflation quickly by saying this will avoid a recession. But let’s not kid ourselves. This massive transfer of income from households to business profits will deal a great blow to the economy.

After going nowhere much for almost a decade,real household disposable income is now expected to fall for two years in a row. And who knows if there’ll be a third.

Economists have made much of the extra saving households did during the pandemic. But during Lowe’s appearance before the parliamentary economics committee on Friday,it was revealed that about 80 per cent of that extra $270 billion in saving was done by the 40 per cent of households with the highest incomes. So,how much of it ends up being spent is open to question.

The likelihood that our measures to weaken household spending will lead to a recession must be very high.

Until Lowe’s remarks before the committee on Friday,his commentary on the causes and cure of inflation seemed terribly one-sided. The key to reducing inflation was ensuring wages didn’t rise by as much as prices had,so that rising inflation expectations wouldn’t lead to a wage-price spiral.

He warned that the higher wages rose,the higher he’d have to raise interest rates. He lectured the unions,saying they needed to be “flexible” in their wage demands. You could see this as giving an official blessing to businesses resisting union pressure and granting pay rises far lower than prices had risen.

After going nowhere much for almost a decade,real household disposable income is now expected to fall for two years in a row. And who knows if there’ll be a third.

Lowe could just as easily have lectured business to be “flexible” in passing on all the higher cost of their imported inputs,when these were expected to be temporary – but he didn’t. He’s always quoting what business people are saying to him,but never what union leaders say – perhaps because he never talks to them.

But on Friday he evened up the record. “It is also important to note that,to date,the stronger growth in wages has not been a major factor driving inflation higher,” he said. “Businesses,too,have a role in avoiding these damaging outcomes,by not using the higher inflation as cover for an increase in profit margins.”

That’s his first-ever admission that,when conditions allow,business has the market power to raise its prices by more than just its rising costs. Problem is,monetary policy’s only solution to this structural weakness – caused by inadequate competitive pressure – is to keep demand perpetually weak.

Ross Gittins is the economics editor.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories,exclusive coverage and expert opinion.Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Ross Gittins is the Economics Editor of The Sydney Morning Herald.

Most Viewed in Business