Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has been engaged in a testy press conference on a bitingly cold Melbourne afternoon.
Addressing into Victorian Labor Party culture,Andrews was quick to apologise for the conduct of some of his Labor MPs,which occurred under his leadership.
However,after taking ownership,he spent the remainder of the hour-long press conference emphasising the uniqueness of dumped MP Adem Somyurek’s misdemeanours.
He used the word “unprecedented” eight times to describe the actions of his factional opponents,who have been ostracised from the Victorian Labor Party since a 2020 exposé byThe Ageand 60 Minutes.
Andrews said he would “go further” than adopting all 21 of the report’s recommendations by creating new laws to uphold internal party rules and banning MPs from hiring family members.
But he faced repeated questions about how it was possible that systemic breaking of party rules and potentially improper use of taxpayer funds could have gone unnoticed for so long.
Andrews said the scale of Somyurek’s actions made this case special. “The unique nature of this is noted by the agencies today in the report,” Andrews said.
“It became known to us at about nine o’clock on Sunday night. By nine o’clock Monday morning,I had sacked a minister and set about an extreme intervention.”
A good indicator of the gravity of a political press conference in Victoria is the attendance of senior journalists who don’t often attend daily media events.
The Age’s chief reporter,Chip Le Grand,was on hand,as wasThe Australian’s associate editor,John Ferguson,who asked Andrews whether,as a young Labor apparatchik known for his recruitment skills in the south-east,he was himself a branch-stacker.
A long back-and-forth ensued between Andrews and Ferguson,in which the premier became increasingly frustrated.
Andrews has previously denied he breached party recruitment rules but did not appear to give an explicit response to Ferguson.
“I’ve answered the question. I just answered the question,” Andrews said.
“John,I’m not here to have a debate with you. You can look at the tape because I just answered.”