“The short answer is no,” Dutton said on Sky News’Sunday Agenda when asked if he would “shirtfront” the premier in his meeting on Monday.
“To be good friends,you need to have an honest relationship where there are concerns,and there’ll be concerns that the Chinese have that they’ll want to raise with us as well.”
Trade Minister Don Farrell said Labor was overturning blocks on Australian exports by acting more maturely than the Coalition.
“We’ve managed to get all these things without kowtowing to the Chinese government,” he said.
James Laurenceson of the University of Technology Sydney’s Australia-China Relations Institute said China hawks like Paterson were right to call out foreign interference but failed to grasp that “China isn’t just about foreign interference or military threats”.
Loading
“They are also about trade,family and friendship ties,and global challenges like climate change. And the way you manage all that is through calm and professional diplomacy of the type being shown during Premier Li’s visit,” he said.
“[ASIO boss] Mike Burgess has remarked that while attempted foreign interference is common,successful attempts are not.”
But Mike Pezzullo,the former secretary of the Home Affairs department,cautioned against the government’s often-repeated lines on China-Australia affairs.
“Abstractions (such as ‘stabilised relations’ and ‘disagree where we must’) have become the framing references for our China policy,” he wrote in arecent article for pro-US think tank the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
“These are talking points that do not add to public understanding. Discourse matters. Emphatic language,involving detailed public explanation,is required. China well understands ‘discourse power’,where the production and management of discourse legitimates the authority of the[Chinese Communist Party].
Loading
“There is now a risk of a new ‘imagined China’ emerging and embedding itself in official thinking. Instead of continuing to work to rally like-minded nations against Chinese coercion,as we did in 2021,the alternative approach of quiet engagement – assuming that if only we moderate our language,then somehow Chinese belligerence will dissipate,and relations will be ‘stabilised’ – might yet entrench a dangerously benign view.
“This approach implies that the challenge is not structural,but rather cyclical,and that we can,through adroit diplomacy,enlarge the space for ‘co-operating where we can’,while minimising the space for ‘disagreeing where we must’.”