Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis lashed Mundine’s characterisation of the,which proposed a Voice,and labelled Mundine “Trumpian”,insisting that the landmark document was “an expression of peace and love to the Australian people”.
In a National Press Club Speech on Wednesday,Voice architect Pearson will strike an optimistic tone by saying the referendum wording completed what Howard – the most influential Coalition prime minister in recent history – called.
“This referendum is testing the idea that a nation conceived in the fiction of Terra Nullius – a continent empty of owners – can come to a new understanding of who we are,” Pearson will say,according to draft speech notes.
”A nation blessed with an Indigenous heritage spanning 60 millennia,a British democracy captured in its Constitution,and a multicultural unity that is a beacon to the world.
“If affirmed,this referendum will seize our first best chance and last best hope for a lasting settlement.
“Australia will start a new chapter,and the nations of the earth will learn that with justice,what remains wrong can be put right,and when people face the truth,they can open their hearts and it is never too late for reconciliation.”
In his firebrand speech to the press club on Tuesday,Mundine – one of the most prominent members of the No campaign – claimed that the Yes campaign is built on a “litany of lies”,as he disputed that back the Voice proposal.
He described the Voice as “a political ploy to grab power,not just from the Australian nation but also from traditional owners themselves”,and argued it is “another lie” that the body would change Indigenous lives for the better.
“If this was true,the gap would already be closed because Indigenous voices have been giving advice to governments for decades. The fact is that Indigenous bodies can give bad advice,like the Coalition of the Peaks who advocated against cashless welfare cards,” he said.
He argued that “as Aboriginal people,we have a choice:to continue to feel angry and aggrieved – to be trapped in the past – or to draw a line in history and move on from a clean slate”.
“The Uluru Statement comes from this place of continuing anger. It couldn’t be further from the idea of reconciliation ... it sees Indigenous Australians as trapped in victimhood and oppression,not free or able to make their own decisions.”
Despite the fact Australia is on track to meet just four of the 19,and Indigenous Australians die eight years younger,on average,than other Australians,Mundine argued that “most Indigenous Australians are doing fine”.
“They go to school,go to work,run businesses,take care of their families and they are not in prison. They don’t need a special Indigenous Voice,” he said.
He argued that the biggest lie of all from the Yes campaign was that he and colleagues in the No camp,including Coalition senators Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Kerrynne Liddle,don’t want things to improve for Indigenous people.
He argued there are four critical areas that need to be addressed:accountability for the billions already spent on Indigenous communities;ensuring that Indigenous children go to school;increasing economic participation;and social change to end violence and abuse in communities.
Mundine surprised many in the last week when he backed with Indigenous Australians and a. He later of the race to fill a casual vacancy for the Liberal Party in the Senate.
He denied arguments that Australia’s,saying he sat on the board of international mining companies and that Americans and Europeans “couldn’t give a crap” about the referendum outcome.
“They don’t really care about Australia,” he said. “Look at some of the countries we do business with and how they treat their own citizens. We’re still doing business with them.”
He also declined to condemn a comedian at a conservative conference hosted by Mundine who joked about “violent black men”,and refused to censure Kerry White,a committee member of his Recognise a Better Way campaign,who recently said.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis..