Jefferies analyst Brian Johnson last week said the immediate exit of Frazis was “troubling”,while Credit Suisse analyst Jarrod Martin said the move raised “earnings risk” as the bank appeared to be flagging plans to focus less on growth,while increasing investment in risk management.
At BOQ’s annual general meeting in Brisbane,Allaway responded to such concerns by saying that once Frazis had lost support of the board,it would have been “destabilising” for him to remain in the job any longer.
Allaway is stepping in as executive chairman until a new CEO is found,a process that could take up to nine months,and he acknowledged the leadership shake-up would have surprised shareholders. But he maintained change was needed to create a “simpler and more resilient bank”,which has emerged as a top priority for the board in the past week.
“We recognise the immediate departure of a CEO and the associated uncertainty is not ideal,but we felt a longer transition would not be in the best interest of BOQ,” he said. “We considered it would be suboptimal and destabilising for George to continue in the CEO role knowing he did not have the ongoing support of the board while the search for his successor was under way.”
Some bank watchers have also speculated relations between BOQ’s board and the CEO had deteriorated,pointing to high turnover of executives and an Australian Financial Reviewreport in March this year in which Allaway publicly raised concerns about aspects of Frazis’ leadership.
In response to an Australian Shareholders’ Association question about executive turnover,Allaway said that in taking on the job of executive chairman,he was seeking to provide leadership stability.