Sneesby said that while the new regulation was well intended – to distribute Australian content – it would drive up costs and lead to “dire” consequences.
“When the big players are forced to create content here and create it on a global scale … a lot of the best ideas will end up going to international players,” he said.
“You get squeezed on cost,and you get squeezed down the pecking order in the great Australian projects that you can get access to. The unintended consequence of that is squeezing out local players. Fast-forward 10 years,the global players will go ‘we’re glad that government forced us to do that because we actually ended up squeezing all the local players out.’”
Sneesby said it would also drive up the cost of local production,forcing Nine to spend more money offshore. “It’ll be likely that[Stan] will have to direct some of its spend offshore,which either means more licensing,or more things co-produced in international markets. You do actually push investment out and force local businesses to look for other ways of competing.”
Arts Minister Tony Burke announced plans in January to introduce rules that would force streaming services to spend a certain amount of money – about 10 per cent of local revenue – on local production by mid-2024. The rules,introduced as part of the new National Cultural Policy,have been welcomed by the Australian production sector,but are fiercely opposed by the TV networks and streaming platforms. Burke is meeting with the affected parties in Canberra over the next two weeks.
‘You get squeezed on cost,and you get squeezed down the pecking order in the great Australian projects that you can get access to. The unintended consequence of that is squeezing out local players.’
Nine CEO Mike Sneesby
Sneesby’s comments are his most outspoken to date on the matter,and are indicative of the concern parts of the media sector have on the introduction of these laws. They were made as Nine,the owner of radio,streaming,real estate and publishing assets includingThe Sydney Morning HeraldandThe Age,reported a decline in profit for the first half of the fiscal year,with rising costs in its broadcast,streaming and real estate divisions outweighing advertising and subscriber revenue growth.