SIA had released a statement saying further testing of Bol’s original failed drug test for the presence of EPO,which led to him being provisionally suspended in January,should have been recorded as a negative.
“It was a false positive like I have said all along,” Bol said in his statement from Europe,where he is training ahead of the World Athletics Championships later this month.
“The news from Sport Integrity Australia was a dream come true.
“I am glad to see that WADA has agreed to review the EPO testing process to prevent future false positives. No one should ever experience what I have gone through this year.
“My process now is the World Athletics Championships coming up in Hungary,I am in good form and feeling well. I appreciate the support I have received.”
Bol wasprovisionally banned in January this year after returning a positive result to doping tests.
A later test of his B sample was found to be “atypical” – neither positive nor negative – but was sufficient for the provisional suspension to be lifted because the B sample did not match the A sample.
But that atypical test was not,on its own,sufficient for Sport Integrity Australia to completely clear him,so an investigation continued.
SIA used more World Anti Doping Authority experts to analyse both of Bol’s A and B blood samples and used different laboratories to analyse the samples for drugs. They found the A sample should have been a negative.
“The further analysis resulted in varying expert opinions as to the positive or negative reporting of the sample,and the A sample was reported as negative,” the SIA statement said.
“As a result,Sport Integrity Australia have taken the decision not to progress an anti-doping rule violation for this sample. The investigation into this sample is finalised.”
WADA released a statement saying it was satisfied SIA had “followed all applicable processes in accordance with the World Anti-Doping Code” in its decision to drop the investigation into Bol for an anti-doping rule violation.
“While we have no reason to question the validity of the analytical method used for recombinant EPO,WADA will assess the current review process in light of the particularities of this case,” the WADA statement read.
Loading
SIA said the process for detecting EPO was unique.
“It is important to highlight that the analysis for synthetic EPO is a unique process which is different to how other prohibited substances are identified,” the SIA statement read.
“Athletes in Australia should have confidence in the anti-doping system that has allowed Sport Integrity Australia to conduct a thorough investigation.
“A review and strengthening of the EPO review process by WADA is an indication of good governance structures in place.
“Sport Integrity Australia will now await outcomes of the WADA review of the EPO review process.
Sport Integrity Australia acknowledges the significant public interest in this outcome. However,Sport Integrity Australia is required to comply with its obligations under the World Anti-Doping Code and its international standards,and our legislative requirements,and cannot make any further comment in relation to the matter.”
Australia’s federal sports minister,Anika Wells,who has executive oversight of SIA was contacted several times for comment.
News,results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport sent every Monday.Sign up for our Sport newsletter.