The Auditor-General has found serious flaws in the way teacher quality is managed across the NSW public school systemCredit:Cathryn Tremain
Principals assessed their staff and teachers could choose who observed them,negotiate what was observed,and were required to agree to the written feedback and goals set. The result was kept by the school,not the department.
One of the few system-wide quality checks - a survey of students'satisfaction with teachers - was voluntary,with 65 per cent of schools participating."These factors limit the ability of the department to target efforts to areas of concern,"the report said.
The report found flawed performance strategies contributed to only 53 teachers - in a permanent and casual workforce of 88,000 - who were formally identified as underperforming.
Loading
Just 29 were dismissed or resigned because of poor performance. Principal reluctance was also a factor in the low numbers identified as underperforming.
Some were hesitant to begin performance management due to the time it took,and others because of past experience."Several principals ... recalled instances where teachers submitted bullying and harassment claims after being informed their practice was below standard,"it said.
The main strategy to improve teaching,the Performance and Development Framework (PDF),was not being used effectively,with little guidance to schools about setting quality goals,observing teachers at work or providing effective feedback.