A parliamentary committee has approved the redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial.

A parliamentary committee has approved the redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial.Credit:Artist impression

But the committee’s deputy chair,Labor MP Tony Zappia,and his colleague David Smith issued a rare dissenting report recommending other options be explored that did not involve demolishing the Anzac Hall,which is less than 20 years old.

“Labor members believe that the government should consult further on this issue and consider alternative approaches that do not involve the complete demolition of the existing Anzac Hall,” they wrote.

They also said the government should consider “lower-cost options”,including a potential overhaul of the War Memorial’s warehouse space in the industrial suburb of Mitchell.

The redevelopment,unveiled in 2018 and supported in principle by both major parties,would expand exhibition space by about 80 per cent with galleries for modern conflicts,and add an underground car park and entrance.

It has come under fire from critics who fear the institution will be turned from a place of remembrance into akind of theme park glorifying war,and say the money could bebetter spent on veterans’ wellbeing.

The Australian Institute of Architects said the committee’s approval showed the government was intent on pushing ahead with the project.

Advertisement

“It seems the government is hell-bent on ignoring all advice about this building,doesn’t care about the memories and stories contained within this building,and simply wants it pulled down no matter the cost,” previous national president Clare Cousins said.

Loading

War Memorial director Matt Anderson has previously acknowledgedthere would always be people unhappy with the redevelopment.

The committee’s majority report acknowledged heritage considerations and the bid to demolish Anzac Hall emerged as “the major controversy” of its inquiry.

“The proposed replacement of Anzac Hall is also of concern to the committee ... it is currently less than 20 years old,and having visited the site,is very much fit for purpose in terms of its current use,” the report states.

However,it ultimately decided it was not for the committee to determine the hall’s heritage value,and said the federal environment department was assessing this.

Start your day informed

Our Morning Edition newsletter is a curated guide to the most important and interesting stories,analysis and insights. Sign up toThe Sydney Morning Herald’s newsletterhere,The Age’shere,Brisbane Timeshere,andWAtoday’shere.

Most Viewed in Politics

Loading