“China has a very active foreign influence operation,” Turnbull said.
Meanwhile,the United States Studies Centre,a think tank at the University of Sydney that promotes the US-Australia alliance,is listed on the register.
Parliamentpassed the scheme following revelations that then-Labor senator Sam Dastyari had contradicted Labor’s policy on the South China Sea while seeking to secure donations from Chinese billionaire Huang Xiangmo.
The laws were applauded by democratic countries such as the US but contributed to the souring of relations between Australia and China,which felt targeted by the new regime.
Turnbull said the laws were designed to be “country agnostic” but,given the way they were operating,a different risk assessment might need to be applied to the activities of democratic and authoritarian countries.
Turnbull said the register “seems to be hoovering up a lot of information of marginal utility” while missing the more disturbing forms of foreign influence it was designed to detect.
Loading
“The rules have been applied in a fairly mechanical,box-ticking way,” he said,adding he believed the biggest problems with the laws might be how they were enforced and administered.
Representatives from the Home Affairs Department,Attorney-General’s Department and Australian Security Intelligence Organisation will also appear before the committee on Tuesday along with university representatives and academic experts.
In 2021,Rudd said he supported the scheme but found it “absurd” the Attorney-General’s Department had advised him he was required to register his interviews with the BBC.
“National security officials have better things to do than chase former cabinet ministers to register TV appearances that,by their nature,are already on the public record,” he said on Twitter.
Loading
Liberal senator James Paterson,a former chair of the intelligence committee,said:“The foreign influence transparency scheme is a vital part of Australia’s defences against the full spectrum of foreign interference threats,but in my view it has not achieved its intended objectives.
“It was supposed to make transparent the covert activities of foreign powers to influence Australia,but as we stand today it has failed to capture some of the most prominent actors.
“It is likely that the legislation will need to be amended to ensure the conduct it was intended to encompass actually falls within the scheme. It will also need much better enforcement options and the resources to back it up.”
Committee chair Peter Khalil said a number of submissions put to the committee pointed to areas in which the scheme was not operating as effectively as it could or should be.
“The committee will assess these submissions and the evidence at the public hearing and make appropriate recommendations to the government,” he said.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weeklyInside Politics newsletter here.