“The Voice,with constitutional recognition,was important. Makarrata is simply a Yolngu word for coming together after struggle. I think it’s a good thing that people come together. And I made that very clear on Saturday night,that is my position. I think that that is a reasonable thing to say.”
In a key comment,Albanese made it clear he wanted Indigenous people to lead the debate and would wait for them.
“I have sought to grant agency to Indigenous Australians,to accept the invitation that they offered,that they worked through,” he said of the Voice.
The campaign for the Voice included three central concepts which were summed up as “Voice,treaty,truth” and were outlined in theUluru Statement from the Heart agreed by Indigenous leaders in 2017.
“We call for the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution,” the statement said.
“Makarrata is the culmination of our agenda:the coming together after a struggle. It captures our aspirations for a fair and truthful relationship with the people of Australia and a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination.
“We seek a Makarrata Commission to supervise a process of agreement-making between governments and First Nations and truth-telling about our history.”
While Albanese promised support for the Uluru statement in full when he won the election in May last year,the practical impact of this is unclear when the Voice has been rejected and the Makarrata Commission has not been established as an entity.
The government has not abandoned any of its policies but is waiting for Indigenous leaders to emerge from the week of silence being sought by many of the Yes campaigners in an unsigned statement issued on Saturday night.
Several Indigenous leaders did not respond to requests for comment on Monday because they are honouring the call for silence.
Albanese turned the attack on Dutton by repeating his common complaint that the opposition leader said “no” to every policy and had gone further by “opposing himself” on the idea of a second referendum.
Dutton said on September 3 that the Coalition would go to the next election with a policyto hold a referendum to recognise Indigenous people in the Constitution,but without a Voice specified in the document.
“Yes,I believe very strongly that that is the right thing to do,” he said at the time.
Loading
That idea wasdismissed within days by the Coalition’s spokeswoman on Indigenous Australians,Jacinta Nampijinpa Price,and Dutton retreated on the idea throughout the rest of the campaign on the Voice.
Asked on Monday morning if he would hold a second referendum if he won the election,Dutton said all Coalition policy on Indigenous affairs would be subject to review by Price and the Coalition spokeswoman on child protection,Kerrynne Liddle.
“I think that’s important,but I think it’s clear that the Australian public is probably over the referendum process for some time,” he said.
Albanese pointed to Dutton’s withdrawal from recognition to set up a contrast between his consistent advocacy for the Indigenous Voice and the opposition leader’s change in position.
“The opposition leader is all trailer and no movie – he never actually sticks to a commitment,which is why he doesn’t recognise conviction when he sees it in someone else,” the prime minister told parliament.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis.Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.