“There are substantial intergenerational equity issues in asking the working age population,which is becoming proportionally smaller,to pay for these services,” it said.
“Moreover,superannuation has been designed to support people to grow their wealth and fund the costs associated with retirement including aged care.”
It called for Australians’ superannuation balances – one-third of which are projected to be passed on as inheritances by the middle of the century – to be drawn down in retirement to cover health,lifestyle,other living expenses and aged care costs.
“Superannuation trends,combined with high asset wealth through the family home and other investments,mean increasingly people still have accumulated wealth and income streams when they need to access aged care services,” the report said.
“As a result,there is more scope for older people to contribute to their aged care costs by using their accumulated wealth than in previous generations.”
However,there would still be people of fewer means who would need the support of a safety net.
The taskforce said someone’s aged pension status would be an appropriate starting point to determine who should be asked to pay more for aged care – which would simplify the current system – but ultimately this would need to be worked through by government.
Aged care is currently funded through three components:care costs in residential homes,which cover day-to-day nursing and personal care;the basic daily living fee,which covers services such as meals,laundry and cleaning;and accommodation costs,which are either paid daily or as a refundable lump sum.
At the moment,there is a means test for “care costs”,which requires some people to contribute out of their own pocket,but this is limited to around $33,000 a year,or $78,500 over a lifetime. The basic daily living fee is also capped:set at 85 per cent of the age pension,or about $61 a day.
The taskforce said the federal government should cover the entirety of people’s care costs,which could be “unexpected and significant”,so no one was worried about whether they could pay for nursing or care.
Loading
But this should be supplemented by significantly higher fees for daily living expenses,such as cooking and cleaning,which people had typically paid for their whole lives. Residents could negotiate these fees with their provider,and receive additional services or amenities,as long as there were consumer protections and complaints processes in place.
“This would allow greater flexibility and offerings for residents willing to pay,and allow providers to diversify their offerings and obtain additional revenue,” the report said.
Lump-sum accommodation deposits that people make when going into residential care should also be phased out and replaced by a rental-only model.
The taskforce argued this new funding mix would simplify the situation for older people and reduce administration costs for providers,but would need to come with a strong safety net for people without income or assets.
Loading
Its high-level recommendations leave major decisions about detail – such as which Australians should be charged more,and how much those fees would be – to the federal government,which is expected to formally respond to the report ahead of the May budget.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis.Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.