Years later,after reporting extensively in Israel,the West Bank and Gaza,I realised the fallacy of this unattainable arrangement and embraced the far more democratic and realistic option,a one-state solution,crafted by Israelis and Palestinians.
Loading
In 2013,I co-edited a collection of essays,After Zionism,with Palestinian Ahmed Moor,and we included a range of Jewish and Palestinian voices explaining how “Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined,enmeshed,irrevocably”.
It’s not a utopian idea,divorced from the reality of Israel and Palestine. Some in both communities don’t like or trust each other. Many Jews want a supremacist state that solely prioritises their lives (in other words,today’s Israel). Some Islamists loathe the concept of Jewish self-determination.
However,other Jews and Palestinians recognise the urgent need to find a way to safely live alongside the other with equal rights under the law (something that is currently only available to Israeli Jews).
The unconscionable Hamas attacks on October 7 will inevitably deepen the divisions between many Israelis and Palestinians. The relentless Israeli bombardment of Gaza,surging settler and Israeli military violence against Palestinians in the West Bank,and an avalanche ofgenocidal statements by Israeli politicians,journalists and the Israeli public increases the need for a different path forward. Public opinion pollsin the US andIsrael/Palestine show growing support for one state,despite the undeniable challenges.
What would the one-state solution look like? There are many ideas,but it could include a total separation between church and state,secular education,Arabic,Hebrew and English as the official languages and a South African-style truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the crimes by all parties,allowing victims to give testimony. The aim is reconciliation,not retribution.
Loading
To achieve real peace will require Palestinians not being forced to ignore their legitimate grievances after decades of Israeli occupation,violence and dislocation. Israeli Jews should not be expected to give up their legitimate historical ties to the land. Many Jews have understandable anxieties about Israel no longer being a Jewish-majority state,so religious,cultural and political safeguards would be put into place to legally protect Jewish (and Palestinian) lives,participation and safety. A one-state solution allows both peoples to have their own histories because there is no one shared narrative.
It’s highly unlikely that Israeli Jews will willingly forgo their current privilege – few occupiers ever have,historically – so it will require interested nations,including Australia,telling the Jewish state that the current treatment of the Palestinian people is unacceptable in the 21st century.
Today’s reality is a de facto one-state arrangement,with millions of Palestinians forced to live under a brutal,Israeli-led regime,fully backed by the West as a form of historical absolution after the Holocaust.
The time is now to imagine a different future where all peoples in the land of Israel and Palestine are truly equal and free.
Antony Loewenstein is an independent journalist and author ofThe Palestine Laboratory who was based in East Jerusalem between 2016 and 2020.
Get a weekly wrap of views that will challenge,champion and inform your own.Sign up for our Opinion newsletter.