And it’s not just about being watched. The data collected is used to group us in increasingly specific “types”,crudely robbing us of nuance and diversity,making us less likely to look at others as fully formed people.
This creepiness is also (unsurprisingly) relentlessly creeping. Year on year,more of who we are is being captured and analysed. From cookies to GPS,from the home organiser to facial recognition,each technological advance is fashioned to capture more of us.
The Albanese government is working on laws that would make our lives a little less creepy. Not before time. Our privacy laws haven’t been meaningfully updated this century,from the time when the internet was only just a thing.
The latest process started under the former Coalition government,part of the important policy challenge of implementing the full recommendations of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s inquiry into digital platforms. This is the inquiry that delivered us the News Media Bargaining Code which has placed more than $150 million into the coffers of media companies (including Nine,the owner of this masthead).
Last month,federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfusbrought forward its final report on privacy law. It’s the last step before legislation is framed and,while he won’t admit it,Dreyfus is waiting to see how this discussion plays out.
The stakes are high. To its credit,the government has put forward a set of reforms that will bring Australia into the (digitally) civilised world. By broadening the definitions of personal information,the proposed laws would cover the contextual profiles that are built up about us. They would also tighten confidentiality of data to allow people the right to clear their digital footprints.