But he does have at least one point. Ultimately,it was a cross-party group of seven MPs (although the majority of them were Conservative) who determined his future. He says they were “determined to use the proceedings against me to drive me out of parliament”,which he said set an “unsettling” and undemocratic precedent.

After everything the British people have endured in the past four years,perhaps it should have been the people who determined Johnson’s fate once and for all. His loyalists (there are still plenty) remain convinced he was popular,was badly wronged,and voters would reflect that.

We will now never know. But one suspects they were,to borrow from Australian prime minister Paul Keating,sitting on their verandas with their baseball bats.

The truth is there is little sympathy in Downing Street or among most cabinet ministers to Johnson’s woes and many will not be sad to see the back of him,at least in parliament.

His departure will trigger a byelection in his seat,which he held with a majority of 7000 at the last election and was already high on Labour’s target list.

In a day of high drama the Tories will also have to defend the seat of Johnson loyalist Nadine Dorries in Mid Bedfordshire,after she also resigned having not been given a peerage on Johnson’s prime ministerial resignation honours list.

Unsurprisingly for someone whose future has not been decided by the great unwashed,Johnson indicated that he was planning to return to politics and said that he had left parliament only “for now at least”.

Already the speculation is Johnson wanted Dorries’ safer seat but the Conservative Party is expected to block him from standing there because it wants a local candidate.

In Johnson’s prime ministerial resignation list,more than 40 of his closest aides and allies were given honours and peerages,including several implicated in the Downing Street parties scandal. He knighted the former cabinet ministers Jacob Rees-Mogg and Simon Clarke and handed peerages to several Downing Street aides. His former home secretary,Priti Patel,was made a dame.

Johnson said the report he had received from the committee on Friday was “riddled with inaccuracies and reeks of prejudice” but under their “absurd and unjust” process he had no ability to challenge anything they said.

“They should not be using their powers,which have only been very recently designed,to mount what is plainly a political hit job on someone they oppose,” he said.

The typical and utterly predictable departure shows Johnson has no intention of going quietly,but no intention of staying quiet either.

Get a note directly from our foreigncorrespondentson what’s making headlines around the world.Sign up for the weekly What in the World newsletter here.